Introduction

Critical transport services depend on uninterrupted digital operations. When a certificate expires unexpectedly or a misconfigured certificate goes unnoticed, the result can be more than an inconvenience. It can create delays, system failures, and widespread disruption across rail networks, airports, highways, and public transport platforms.

As the UK transport sector continues to modernise, the reliance on secure communication, trusted machine-to-machine interactions, and protected digital services has never been higher. Certificate outages, once seen as minor IT issues, are now recognised as serious operational risks.

‍

Why Certificate-Related Outages Are a Growing Problem

Many transport organisations still manage certificates using manual tracking, shared inboxes, or spreadsheets. As the volume of certificates increases across cloud services, operational technology (OT), Internet of Things (IoT), and mobile applications, this approach becomes unmanageable.

Common causes of certificate outages include:

• Certificates expiring without warning
• Inability to locate certificates across distributed systems
• Unknown or rogue certificates in legacy or third-party environments
• Weak or outdated cryptographic standards
• Human error during renewal, replacement, or deployment

Research across critical infrastructure indicates that a significant number of cyber incidents originate from certificate failures rather than deliberate attacks. This makes proactive, automated lifecycle management essential.

‍

How Certificate Failures Impact UK Transport Operations

When certificates fail, the effects can be immediate and highly visible. Possible consequences include:

• Rail signalling systems unable to authenticate commands, causing delays or halts
• Airport access control or flight display systems going offline
• Smart motorway infrastructure unable to verify device communication
• Public transport ticketing platforms or APIs becoming unavailable
• Payment and revenue systems experiencing downtime

In each case, expired or invalid certificates undermine trust, not only between systems, but also with passengers and partners who rely on consistent, safe, and reliable services.

‍

Why Certificate Lifecycle Management (CLM) Prevents These Incidents

Certificate Lifecycle Management provides the structure, visibility, and automation needed to prevent outages. Effective CLM supports:

• Discovery of all certificates across IT, OT, and cloud environments
• Continuous monitoring for upcoming expiry, misconfiguration, or weak cryptography
• Automated issuance, renewal, and revocation
• Integration with identity systems, DevOps pipelines, and device management platforms
• Clear ownership and governance for certificate stewardship

By reducing manual effort, CLM ensures that certificate management becomes a proactive process, rather than a reactive emergency response.

‍

Strategic Outcomes for Transport Operators

Adopting robust CLM delivers operational and organisational benefits, including:

• Reduced risk of outages linked to expired or misconfigured certificates
• Increased operational continuity and public confidence
• Faster response to incidents due to clear certificate inventories and audit trails
• Enhanced compliance with NIS regulations, ISO 27001, and industry assurance frameworks
• Greater support for digital transformation, cloud migration, and IoT expansion

As transport systems become more connected, the scale of certificate use continues to rise. CLM enables transport operators to grow digital services without increasing operational risk.

‍

The Role of Unsung Ltd

Unsung Ltd helps transport organisations reduce certificate-related outages by improving visibility, governance, and automation across PKI and CLM environments. Typical areas of support include:

• Certificate discovery across legacy, cloud, and operational systems
• Design and deployment of automated CLM platforms
• Implementation of PKI policy frameworks and governance models
• Support for crypto-agility and long-term cryptographic transition planning

The goal is to ensure organisations can operate confidently, with a resilient and reliable digital trust foundation.

‍

Conclusion

Transport services depend on more than physical infrastructure. They rely on the integrity and availability of digital systems that support operations, safety, and customer services. Expired certificates are preventable, yet without structured lifecycle management, they remain a persistent risk.

By adopting Certificate Lifecycle Management, UK transport operators can secure critical systems, maintain service continuity, and protect public confidence as they modernise and expand digital capabilities.

‍